AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 6, Number3. August 2022 Pp.177-199
Significance of Performative Speech Acts for the Translation of Nahjul Balagha from
Arabic into English
Khalida H. Tisgam
Department of English, College of Education for Women
University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Corresponding Author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mehdi Falih alGhazalli
Department of Translation, Faculty of Arts
Al-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq
Received: 05/27/2022 Accepted:08/20/2022 Published:08/28/2022
The current study investigates the significance of performative speech acts for translating Nahjul Balagha. Attempting to accredit the claim that performatives are essential for understanding the intended meaning of a text is, speech act theory is employed to show that the different functions of performative acts must be considered in translation. For the elucidation of the potential of this theory, this study employs Searle’s taxonomy. The main question of this study is: How does Imam Ali (A.S.) employs performatives in his letters? In relation to this, the present study aims to see how Imam Ali’s performative acts in Nahjul Balagha are interpreted and then translated into English. To achieve this aim, the study qualitatively analyzes five selected letters from Nahjul Balagha with their English translation by Reza (2003) by comparing the performative function in the source text with the English target text. The results of this study attested the significance of performatives for translating Nahjul Balagha. It has been shown that Imam usually uses various performatives, mainly directives, to effect change in his addressee(s).
Keywords: Directives, Imam Ali, Nahjul Balagha, pragmatics, performative utterances, performativity,
speech acts theory,translation from Arabic into English
Cite as: Tisgam, K. H., & alGhazalli, M. F. (2022). Significance of Performative Speech Acts for the Translation of Nahjul Balagha from Arabic into English. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 6 (3) 177-199.
Abbas, N. (2020). Pragmatics of Overlapping Talk in Therapy Sessions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1251-1263.
Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Arabic Rhetoric. A Pragmatic Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
Al-Hindawi, F. & Mohammed, W.M. (2018). Towards an Analytical Model in Critical Pragmatics. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(4) 162 -176.
Al-Ameedi, R. & Abd, S. (2021). Politeness in Social Justice Texts of the New Testament and Nahjul- Balagha. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 4(7), 165-173.
Austin, L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Bach, K. & Harnish, L.M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT.
Bariki, O. (2019). On the Relationship between Translation and Pragmatics. In Ndimele, Ozo-mekuri, Four Decades in the Study of Nigerian Languages and Linguistics (pp.605-611). Nigeria: M & J. Educational Books.
Baker, M. & Saldanha, G. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. 3rd ed. London & New York: Routledge.
Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Course Book on Translation. London: Routledge.
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in Iinterlanguage Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Blum-Kulka, S & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too Many Words: Length of Utterance and Pragmatic Failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8 (2), 165-179.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1981). The Study of Translation in View of New Developments in Discourse Analysis. The Problem of Indirect Speech Acts. In Poetics Today. 2(4). 89-95.
Briggs, R.S. (2001). Words in Action: Speech Act Analysis and Biblical Interpretation: Toward a Hermeneutic of Self-Involvement. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Collavin, E. (2011). Speech Acts. In W. Bublitz, N.R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics (pp. 373- 395). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.
Cruse, A. (2006). Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Davies, E. (1986). The English Imperative. London: Croom Helm.
Farghal, M. (2018). English Non-generic Negation: A Problematic Area for Arabic Translators. KnE Social Sciences, 3, 562-574.
Farghal, M. & Almanna, A. (2014). Some Pragmatic Aspects of Arabic/ English Translation of Literary Texts. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature, 6(2), 93-114.
Fawcett, P. (1997/2014). Translation and Language: Linguistic Theories Explained. Routledge: London and New York.
Fawcett, p. (1998). Ideology and Translation. In M. Baker (Ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (pp. 106-111). London: Routledge.
Fotion, N. (2000). John Searle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gambier, Y. & Gottlieb, H. (2001). (Multi)media Translation: Concepts, Practices, and Research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gutt, E. A. (2000). Translation and relevance: cognition and context (2nd ed). St. Jerome.
Hassan, S.M. (1979). A critical study of Nahj Al-Balagha. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
Hassan, B. A. (2011). Literary Translation: Aspects of Pragmatics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Hatim, B. & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.
Hatim, B. & Mason, I. (1997). The Translator as Communicator. Routledge: London.
Hickey, L. (1998). The pragmatics of translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Horn, L. R. (2001). A natural history of negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
House, J. (1977). Translation Quality Assessment. 2nd ed. 1981. Tübingen: Narr House, Juliane; Jochen Rehbein (eds) (2004):
Multilingual Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hsieh, F. (2009), Repetition in social interaction: a case study on Mandarin conversations, International Journal of Asian Languages Processing, 19(4) 153-168.
Langton, R. (1993). Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(4), 293-330.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Limited.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Liddicoat, A. (2014) Pragmatics and Intercultural Mediation in Intercultural Language Learning. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(2) 259 – 277.
Lovejoy, H. (2013). Ethics Politics of Translating. Cadernos de Tradução, 1(31). https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/traducao/article/view/2175-7968.2013v1n31p237
Mey, J. L. (2000). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Mirza, R. F. (2017). Politeness in Imam Ali’s Letter to Malik Al-Ashtar. Adab Al-Kufa, 2(33), 55-68.
Molina, L. & Albir, A. H. (2002). Translation Techniques Revisited: A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach. Meta, 47(4) 498- 512.
Morini, M. (2012). The Pragmatic Translator: An Integral Theory of Translation. Bloomsbury: Publishing PLC.
Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In Otto Neurath et al. (Eds.). Inter-national encyclopedia of unified science. I(2) 1-59. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.
Parker, F. & Riley, K. (2005). Linguistics for Non-Linguists: A Primer with Exercises. New York: Frank Parker and Kathryn Riley.
Pearsall, J. (2001). The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pérez-Hernández, L. (2021). Speech Acts in English. From Research to Instruction and Textbook Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pratt, Mary Louise. (1977). Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. London: Indiana University Press.
Qassim, T., Abbas, N., Ahmed, F., & Hameed, S. (2021). Pragma-linguistic and Socio-pragmatic Transfer among Iraqi Female EFL Learners in Refusing Marriage Proposals. AWEJ, 12(2), 521-539. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.35
Reza, S. A. (2003). English Translation of Nahjul Balagha. Qom: Ansariyan.
Saldanha, G. & O’Brien, S. (2013). Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
Schulte, R. (1979). The Act of Translation: From Interpretation to Interdisciplinary Thinking. Translation Review, 4(1) 3-8.
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1976). Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Shabbar, S.M.R. (2012). Story of the Holy Ka’aba and its People. Ireland: Muhammadi Trust of Great Britain and Northern.
Shah-Kazemi, R. (2006). Justice and Remembrance; Introducing the Spirituality of Imam ‘Ali. London: I. B. Tauris.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stetkevych, S. (2019). Al-Sharīf al-Raḍī and Nahj al-balāghah: Rhetoric, Dispossession, and the Lyric Sensibility. Journal of Arabic Literature, 50, 211-250.
Sontag, S. (2013). At the Same Time: Essays and Speeches. New York. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Swales, J. (1993). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tian, Y., & Pho, K. H. (2019). A statistical view to study the aphorisms in Nahj al-Balaghah. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35 (4), 881-885.
Thunes, M. (2017). The concept of ‘Translation Unit’ Revisited. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies. 8(1). https://bells.uib.no/index.php/bells/article/view/1331
Tisgam, KH. (2014). Translating Figurative Language. Lark Journal for Philosophy, Linguistics and Social Sciences. 6(15), 27-49.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
Wales, K. (1989) A Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman.
Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (2013) from Speech Acts to Speech Actions. Łódź: Łódź University Press.
Wright, W. (1974). A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Lebanon: A .J.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.