Menu
AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 6, Number1. February 2022 Pp.53-66
Department of World Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Ivan Franko National University
of Lviv, Ukraine
The metamodernist mood of the modern era increasingly clearly correlates with the transformation of literary methodologies and methods of reading, analysis, and interpretation of literary texts. The study of the genre specificity of the novel is one of the essential segments of the latest scientific studies, given its flexibility and significant textual representation in various national works of literature. This paper offers a critical review of the key stages in the history of the study of the novel as a literary genre, as well as shows the possibilities of understanding the poetic aspects of the author’s style. The material of the research relies on the novels by the Canadian writer Lucy Maud Montgomery and the US writer Eleanor Porter. Both authors belonged to the same historical and cultural era; their work has many typological parallels due to objective factors. At the same time, the modernist worldview was embodied in each stylistic manner in its own way. Comparison of individual styles makes it possible to carry out a typological analysis within a particular genre with access to the study of common sources of image creation, as well as modeling the interpretive paradigm of metamodernism in the projection on the literature of different historical periods taking into account national characteristics. At the same time, the research opens up the prospect of expanding the methodological horizons of narratology for its progress beyond its “boundaries”: outside of literary studies, in a significant context, as well as in space outside of fiction.
Matsevko-Bekerska, L., Nikolenko,O., Kokhan, R. & Nikolenko, K. (2022). Narrative Aspects of the Novels by Lucy Maud Montgomery and Eleanor Porter. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 6(1) 53-66.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol6no1.5
Bakhtin, M. (1975). Issues of Literature and Aesthetics. Moscow: Fiction.
Davis, K. (1996). The Child and the Social Structure. Journal of Educational Sociology, 14(4), 217-229.
Elkonin, D.B. (2005). Child Psychology: Textbook for Universities. Moscow: Academia.
Esalnek, A.Ya. (1991). Theoretical Foundations of the Typological study of the Novel. Typology of the Novel, 4-36.
Garbarino, J. (1987). The Significance of Ethnic and Cultural Differences in Child Maltreatment.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(4), 773-783.
Genette, G. (1998). Figures: In 2 volumes. Volume 1-2. Moscow: Sabashnikov Publishing House.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1971). Aesthetics: In 4 volumes. Moscow.
Kochubey, T. (2014). Philosophy of Childhood in the Legacy of Teachers-Thinkers of the XVII-XX Centuries.
Problems of Modern Teacher Training, 10(3), 260-261.
Cohn, I.S. (2004). Childhood as a Social Phenomenon. Journal of Social Policy Research, 2(2), 151-174.
Lukács, G. (1965). Die Theorie des Romans. Darmstadt.
Mead, M. (2004). Culture and the World of Childhood: Selected Works. Moscow: Nauka.
Minsky, M. (1979). Frames for the Presentation of Knowledge. Moscow: Energy.
Mitrofanova, S.Yu. (2017). Conceptualization of the main approaches to the study of childhood in sociology.
Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 3-15.
Montgomery, L.M. (2008). Anne of Green Gables. London: Penguin Random House.
Montgomery, L.M. (2021a). Emily of New Moon: (Complete Annotated). Independently published.
Montgomery, L.M. (2021b). Pat of Silver Bush. London: Sourcebooks Fire.
Papusha, I. (2013). Modus Ponens. Essays on Narratology. Ternopil: Krok.
Porter, E. (2004). Pollyanna / trans. from English by B. Gora. Kyiv: Shkola.
Slavova, M. (2002). Cinderella of literature. Theoretical aspects of children’s literature. Kyiv.
Sobchuk, O. (2012). Rethinking the Concepts of Narrative, Character and Focalization in Modern Conative
Narratology. Magisterium, 48, 108-113.
Solso, R. (2006). Cognitive Psychology.6th ed. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Vygotsky, L.S. (2004). Psychology of human development. Moscow.
Yousef, T.(2017). Modernism, Postmodernism, and Metamodernism: A Critique.
International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 33-43.
Lidiia Matsevko-Bekerska, Doctor of Sciences (Dr. Hab.), Professor, is the Head of the Department of World Literature, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-5904
Olha Nikolenko, Doctor of Sciences (Dr. Hab.), Professor, is the Head of the Department of World Literature, Faculty of Philology and Journalism, Poltava V.G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-7226
Roksoliana Kokhan, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages for Natural Sciences, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-9486
Kateryna Nikolenko is a Ph.D. student of the Department of World Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-8483
Copyright © 2023 AWEJ-tls.org. All rights reserved.