AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 4, Number2. May 2020 Pp.177-186
Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Economics and Law, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Department of Germanic and Finno-Ugrian Philology, Faculty of Germanic Philology, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Department of the Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Slavic Philology, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Modern linguistic studies encompass a wide range of approaches for explaining language in use through the set of different semiotic resources. This paper discusses the use and informative significance of such funds in the framework of conflict studies in English fictional discourse. The phenomenon of conflict discourse multimodality, which combines several semiotic systems as particular modes of communication, helps to reveal the communicative and pragmatic value of verbal and nonverbal means of conflict settlement and resolution. The paper aims to determine how the nonverbal means of communication in conflict discourse influence the process of conflict interaction and what implications its interpretation has on conflict development and resolution. To achieve this, the study relies upon the analysis of semantic, formal, and functional peculiarities of nonverbal conflict-management mode in the structural organization of conflict fictional discourse. The analysis of nonverbal mode as a combination of different semiotic resources reveals that nonverbal conflict-management mode is represented by a specific set of patterns in English fictional discourse. Moreover, the process of conflict communication may be regulated nonverbally, governing, completing, strengthening, or resolving the conflict. The obtained results indicate that analysis of the nonverbal means in conflict fiction discourse with a focus on multimodal studies enables to get a true picture of the role of nonverbal conflict-management mode in the actual and potential realization of communicative strategies which in correlation with its pragmatic impact and some sociolinguistic features contribute to the influence on the process of conflict resolution and management.
Sieriakova,I., Chernenko, O., & Muntian, O. (2020). Multimodal Conflict Management in English Fictional Discourse. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 4 (2) 177-186.
Argyle, M. (1972). Nonverbal Communication in Human Social Interaction. Nonverbal Communication, 11 (3), 243 – 268.
Arola, K. L., Ball, Ch. E., & Sheppard, J. (2014). Writer/Designer: A Guide to Making Multimodal Projects. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Bowen, A. (1982). Dangerous Promise. New York: Superromance.
Cabot, P. (2002). Kiss the Bride. New York: Sonnet Books.
Charles, M. (1989). Diamond Moods. New York: Silhouette Books.
Cronin, A. (1963). The Citadel. Moscow: Foreign language publishing house.
Delinsky, B. (2003). An Accidental Woman. New York: Pocketbooks.
Denault, V. et al. (2020). The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts. Anuario de Psicologнa Jurнdica, 30(1), 1 – 12.
Dreiser, T. (1998). Genius. Moscow: Higher school publishing house.
Dreiser, T. (2008). Sister Carrie. Moscow: Higher School Publishing House.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behaviour: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding. Semiotica, 1, 49 – 98.
Follett, K. (2005). Whiteout. London: Macmillan publisher.
Gamble, T. K., & Gamble, M. (2012). Communication works (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Hasan B. I. (1996). Psychotechnics of Conflict and Conflict Competence. Krasnoyarsk: The fund of mental health.
Hertenstein, M., & Keltner, D. (2011). Gender and the Communication of Emotion via Touch. Sex roles, 64 (1-2), 70 – 80.
Kelly, C. (1998). She’s the one. London: Headline.
Kendon, A. (2018). Pragmatic Functions of Gestures: Some Observations on the History of Their Study and Their Nature. Gesture, 16 (2), 157 – 175.
Kozyarevych, L. V. (2006). Verbal and Nonverbal Methods of Empathy Expression in Dialogic Discourse (on the material of English prose of XX century). (Published Doctoral Thesis). Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Knapp, M., Hall, J. (1997). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction (4th ed.). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Krejdlin, G. E. (2002). Nonverbal Semiotics: Body Language and Natural Language. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
Królikowska, P. (2015). Discourse of Conflict as Political Genre. Thesis for the doctor’s degree in philology. (Published Doctoral Thesis). Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Available at: http://dspace.uni.lodz.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11089/11885/Doktorat_Dyskurs%20konfiktu%20jako%20gatunek%20polityczny_Paulina%20Kr%C3%B3likowska.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Kurylo, O. Y., & Rozman, I. I. (2017). Verbal and Nonverbal Aspects of Culture of Communication. Young Scientist, 4.3 (44.3), 114 – 118.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
Makaruk, L. L. (2015). Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Multimodal Texts. M. Wojciech, & R. Marietta (eds.), Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics and Corpus-based Studies (Vol. III, pp. 26-36). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Malki, I. (2018). Conflict Resolution Strategies in Media Discourse: The case study. International journal of social science studies, 6(5), 24 – 35.
Maugham, W.S. (1972). The Moon and Sixpence. Moscow: Progress publishers.
Mitchel, A. D., & Weiss D. J. (2014). Visual Speech Segmentation: Using Facial Cues to Locate Word Boundaries in Continuous Speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29 (7), 771 – 780.
Netrebina, S. P. (2016). Somaticon of the Character’s Emotional Response in English Fictional Discourse. (Published Doctoral Thesis). Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
O’Halloran, K. (ed). (2004). Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
Steel, D. (1994). The Gift. New York: A Dell Book.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1990). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. New York: XICOM.
Zhukovska, A. V. (2018). The Speaker’s Tactile Behaviour in English Fictional Discourse: Nominative, Communicative, and Pragmatic Aspects. (Published Doctoral Thesis). Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Zolotarenko, T. О. (2015). Representation of the Speaker’s Invective Behaviour in Conflict Discourse (A Study of the Novels by Stephen King). (Published Doctoral Thesis). Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Iryna Sieriakova, DSc. in Philology, Professor of Linguistics at the Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Economics and Law, former Vice-Rector for Studies and International Affairs, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraine. Her research interests include discourse analysis, the pragmatics of discursive practices, non-verbal semiotics, cross-cultural studies. ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-7070
Olha Chernenko, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Germanic and Finno-Ugrian Philology, Faculty of Germanic Philology, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraine. Her research interests are pragmatics, conflict discourse studies, non-verbal semiotics,
gender studies, grammar. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-8915
Oleksandr Muntian, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of the Russian Language and Literature, Dean of the Faculty of Slavic Philology, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraine. His research interests are the historical linguistics, Russian studies, crosscultural studies, foreign language teaching. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7004- 0249