Login/Register

AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 8, Number 2 May 2024 Pp. 131-144

Meat Consumption as a Metaphor: Gender Differences in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman

Nahed Mohammed Ahmed Meklash

English Department
Faculty of Education, Matrouh University, Matrouh, Egypt.
Corresponding Author: nahedmeklash24@mau.edu.eg

Abstract:

This paper studies the metaphorical representation of gender differences in meat consumption, a vital issue in vegetarian ecofeminism, masculine food studies, and feminist animal studies. In the context of Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman, the metaphor of meat eating resonates with Carol J. Adams’ concepts of the linked relation between women and edible animals and J Wyckoff’s linked oppression of sexism and speciesism. Using these concepts as a critical intersectional lens, the paper explores the various forms of gender oppression Marian is subject to, the power dynamics in Marian-Peter’s relationships, and the potential solutions presented by Atwood’s novel to resist such gender oppression that threatens Marian’s survival. The central question of this paper is how Marian’s identification with edible animals through Atwood’s use of meat consumption as a metaphor portrays the gender dynamics of oppression that threaten her relationship with Peter, thus leading to further gender imbalances in her society. The paper concludes that ensuring women are free to choose and speak up, regardless of societal expectations or gender, is crucial to eliminating some oppressive forms. However, it also argues that adopting a vegetarian lifestyle is not a practical solution to dismantling sexism or resisting other gender oppressions. It may perpetuate new forms of gender inequality and oppression

Cite as:

Meklash, N. M. A. (2024). Meat Consumption as a Metaphor: Gender Differences in
Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 8 (1), 131-144.

References:

ACE Interviews: Carol J. Adams – Animal Charity Evaluators. Available at https://animalcharityevaluators.org/blog/ace-interviews-carol-j-adams/

Adams, C. J. (2010). Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York: Continuum.

Adams, C. J., & Josephine, D. (1995). Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Available at https://philpapers.org/rec/ADAAAW

Atwood, M. (2010). The Edible Woman. Emblem Editions.

Boro, K. (2022). Food and Gender Narratives in the Select works of Mamang Dai and Easterine Kire. Indian Literature, 66(3 (329)), 106–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27277280

Case: Meat in Literature – Food Studies: Matter, Meaning, Movement. (n.d.). Available at https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/foodstudies/chapter/meat-made-manifest/

Counihan, C. M., & Kaplan, S. L. (2003). Food and gender: Identity and power. In Food and Gender: Identity and Power. Harwood Academic. Available at https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381243/FOOD-GENDER-CAROLE-COUNIHAN-STEVEN-KAPLAN

Canadian Animal Stories: Charles G. D. Roberts, “Do Seek Their Meat from God” (1892) (Chapter 1) – The Canadian Short Story. (n.d.). Available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/canadian-short-story/canadian-animal-stories-charles-g-d-roberts-do-seek-their-meat-from-god-1892/F6AB9A354FD56CD337DAA508A84E8932

Gaard, G. (2002). Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 23(3), 117–146. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3347337

Kellman, S. (2000). Fish, Flesh, and Foul: The Anti-Vegetarian Animus. American Scholar, 69(4), 85–96. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/41213076

Lyons, B. (1992). “Using People’s Dreadful Childhoods,” E. G. Ingersoll (ed.): Margaret Atwood Conversation. London: Virago Press. 221–33. – Google Search. (n.d.). Retrieved May 4, 2023. Available at https://www.google.com/search?client=avast-a-1&sxsrf=APwXEdf3QzTYoTeOXUzgSqpUigxpuBuEEw:1683158837920&q=Lyons,+Brooke.+(1992).+%E2%80%9CUsing+People%E2%80%99s+Dreadful+Childhoods,%E2%80%9D+E.+G.+Ingersoll+(ed.):+Margaret+Atwood+Conversation.+London:+Virago+Press.+221%E2%80%9333.&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwitzYmlr9r-AhWVElkFHerKBM0Q0pQJegQIDhAB&biw=1692&bih=784&dpr=1.13

McLean, A. (2013). Feminist Food Studies: A Critical Overview. Available at https://www.academia.edu/36221592/Feminist_Food_Studies_A_Critical_Overview

McWilliams, E. (2014). Margaret Atwood’s Canadian hunger artist: Postcolonial appetites in the edible woman. Kunapipi, 28(2). Available at https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol28/iss2/9

Parker, E. (1995). You Are What You Eat: The Politics of Eating in the Novels of Margaret Atwood. Twentieth Century Literature, 41(3), 349–368. Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/441857

Pundir, L. (2012). Marian’s search for self in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 3(4), 1–4.

Quinn, E. (2018). Monstrous Vegan Narratives: Margaret Atwood’s Hideous Progeny. In  E. Quinn & B. Westwood (eds.), Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 149–173). Springer Nature. Available at https://doi.o rg/10.1007/978-3-319-73380-7_7

Roles, C. F. (2021). “The Surface on Which You Work”: Self-Alienation and the Culture of Narcissism in The Edible Woman. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 63(3), 276–298. Available at https://doi.org/10.7560/TSLL63303

Royanian, S., & Yazdani, Z. (2011). Metaphor of Body in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, 2(3), 233–239.

Salmen, A., & Dhont, K. (2023). Animalizing women and feminizing (vegan) men: The psychological intersections of sexism, speciesism, meat, and masculinity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(2), e12717. Available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12717

Sobal, J. (2005). Men, Meat, and Marriage: Models of Masculinity. Food and Foodways, 13(1–2), 135–158. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710590915409

Striewski, S. (2024). Women, Animals, Food: Planetary perspectives on the non-(hu)man. Comparative Woman, 2(2), 2, 1-11.

Tolan, F. (2007). Margaret Atwood: Feminism and Fiction. Brill. Available at https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204545

Wyckoff, J. (2014). Linking Sexism and Speciesism. Hypatia, 29(4), 721–737. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/HYPA.12098

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg

Dr. Nahed Mohammed Ahmed Meklash teaches English literary studies at the Faculty of Education at Matrouh University. She is a member of ASLE-UKI. She presented papers in ‘Cross-Cultural Communication Studies in Literature, Linguistics, and Translation,” “Decentering the Irish World: Contemporary and New Directions in Global Irish Studies,” British University, “Stories from Arab and /or African Perspectives: Language, Literature, and Beyond,” and “Women of The World,” Alex University. She is a peer reviewer for the LLIDS Journal. She has published “An Intersectional Reading of Women of Color’s Multiple Identities and Differences in the Poetry of Audre Lorde” and “An Africana Womanist Reading of The Unity of Thought and Action”. She has recently published “A Cultural Ecological Reading of Human-Nature Interconnectivity in Mahmoud Darwish’s “The Second Olive Tree” ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-9461