AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 5, Number 1. February 2021 Pp.187-200
Applied Languages, Literature, and Translation
Jaume I University, Castellon De La Plana, Spain
English Language/ College of Languages
Komar University for Science and Technology
Shelley’s Frankenstein has been considered a literary masterpiece since its publication. Saadawi’s Frankenstein in Baghdad is similarly a work of great significance that won the International Prize for Arabic Fiction in 2014. Since its release, the name ‘Frankenstein’ attached to Baghdad, as a novel title in the mid of the American occupation of Iraq (2005) and its connection to a universal Frankenstein, has been inspiring to the Iraqis and world fiction lovers. What remains essential about this fascination among the readers is in the questions of how and what is the connection between both works. Therefore, this paper attempts to discover the roots of the concept of creation behind Shelley’s Frankenstein in 1818 and Ahmed Saadawi’s Frankenstein in Baghdad in 2013 from mythology, theology, science, and political reality of Iraq. Besides, the linear evolution in the concept of creation throughout the mentioned areas will be displayed to unfold the origins that lie behind these colossal novels. Understanding that lineage development in the concept and the disputes around it is of great significance to the reader which can empower them to contextualize the novels since apprehending new context is a vital factor for appropriation and intertexuality. As long as there are creators and creatures as the two sides of the same process of creation, therefore, the mentioned concepts will always be discussed throughout this work; including the punishment that both protagonists suffer from as one common consequence.
Mahmood, k. A. (2021). Evolution of Creation from Mythology to Reality: A Multidisciplinary Study into the Roots of Shelley’s Frankenstein and Ahmed Sa’adawi’s Frankenstein in Baghdad. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 5 (1) 187-200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol5no1.13
Allen, G. (2011). Intertextuality: Origins: Saussure, Bakhtin, Kristeva (p. 11). Routledge.
Anstey, P. R, & Schuster, J. A. (2005). The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy (p. 165). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Barton, J., & Muddiman, (2001). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colavito, J. (2008). Knowing Fear: Science, Knowledge and the Development of the Horror Genre. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Feuerbach, L. (1972). Principles of Philosophy of the Future. 1st ed. The Fiery Brook. Available at https://rowlandpasaribu.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/ludwig-feuerbach-principles-of-philosophy-of-the-future.pdf
Garfinkle, N. (1955). Science and Religion in England, 1790-1800: The Critical Response to the Work of Erasmus Darwin. Journal of the History of Ideas, 16(3), 376-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707638.
George, A. (2000). The Epic of Gilgamesh (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Classics.
Hankir, Z. (2018). Ahmed Saadawi wants to tell a new story about the war in Iraq. Literary Hub, June 19. Available at https://lithub.com/ahmed-saadawi-wants-to-tell-a-new-story-about-the-war-in-iraq/
Harari, Y. (2015). Sapiens: a Brief History of Humankind. London: Vintage.
Harvey, D. Population, Resources, and the Ideology of Science. Economic Geography, 50(3), 256–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/142863.
Hesiod, H. (2006). Theogony and Works and Days. Michigan USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Holloway, J., & Benemérita, P. (2010). Crack Capitalism. Universidad Autónoma de: Pluto Press.
Koveshnikov, B., &, Romensky, L. (2006). Human Anatomy (1st Vol). Ukraine: Lugansk.
Lambert, W.G. (2013). Babylonian creation myths. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Leitch, T. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies. Oxford University Press.
Lensmire, T. J., & Beals, D. E. (1994). Appropriating others’ words: Traces of literature and peer culture in a third-grader’s writing. Language in Society, 411-426.
McAdie, A. (p. 188). The Date of Franklin’s Kite Experiment. Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, N.S, 188, 188-205. Available at https://www.americanantiquarian.org/proceedings/44806729.pdf.
McKeon, M. (Ed.). (2000). Theory of the novel: A Historical approach. JHU Press.
Saadawi, A. (2017). Frankenstein in Baghdad. Translated by Jonathan Wright. New York: Penguin books.
Sanders, J. (2015). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge.
Shelley, M. (1992). Frankenstein: the Modern Prometheus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Stern, J. (2003). How America created a terrorist haven. New York Times, 20.
Tigay, J. (2002). The Evolution of the Epic of Gilgamesh (2nd ed.). Wauconda, Illinois USA: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.
Westfahl, G., & Benford, G., V. Hendrix, H. V., Alexander, J. (2020). Science Fiction and the Dismal Science: Essays on Economics in and of the Genre. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Karzan Mahmood obtained B A and M A in Iraq and the U K and is currently a Ph.D. student in Spain, all in English literature. His research interests include Romantic Sublime, Intertextuality, Appropriation, Literary Theory and Criticism, Marxism, and Postmodern Studies. He has been teaching English literature from Komar University for Science and Technology since 2016. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8860-5781