AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 5, Number4. October 2021 Pp. 92-108
Since people are showing more interest recently in movies and as movie reviews of the same movie could vary in the degree of their objectivity, this paper seeks to answer why movie reviews may differ in their evaluation of the same work. To this end, a critical discourse analysis using Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework and Martin and White’s attitude framework is carried out to analyze two reviews of the Saudi movie Wadjda, one written in English by a western critic, and the other is Arabic written by a Saudi critic. The textual analysis of attitudinal expressions shows that the English text maintains an even distribution between the negative and positive expressions, and most of the negative expressions do not assess the aspects of the movie but rather the Saudi society. In the Arabic text, however, the negative expressions outnumber the positive ones, and they are mostly related to the movie and the director. Using Fairclough’s framework, the author explains the findings of the textual analysis of the English review and the critic’s avoidance of negative evaluation as a result of Eurocentrism and the way the western media represent Arabs and Muslims. However, the negative appraisal of several movie aspects found in the Arabic review could be seen as a result of the critic being part of the society and, thus, not distracted by the social issues.
Almohaimeed, M. S. (2021). Evaluation of Wadjda: A Comparative Discourse Analysis of Western and Saudi Movie Reviews. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 5 (4) 92-108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol5no4.8
Abdel Moneim, Y. (2016). Sourat Almar’ah Alarabiah fi Alsahafa Alamrekiah wa Al Britaniah [Representation of Arab women in the American and British Journalism]. Al Arabi Publishing and Distributing.
Assael, H. (1984). Consumer behavior and marketing action. Kent Pub. Co.
Bieler, H., Dipper, S., & Stede, M. (2007). Identifying formal and functional zones in film reviews. Proceedings of the 8th SIGDIAL, 75-78.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power: London. Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
Griswold, W. (1987). The fabrication of meaning: Literary interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1077-1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/228628
Hall, A. (2001). Film reviews and the public’s perceptions of stereotypes: Movie critics’ discourse about The Siege. Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385638
Hobson, J., 2006. East and West in global history. Theory, Culture and Society, 23 (2–3), 408–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300273
Hsu, G. (2006). Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(3), 467-496.
Kassimeris, G., & Jackson, L. (2011). The West, the rest, and the ‘war on terror’: Representation of Muslims in neoconservative media discourse. Contemporary politics, 17(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2011.552684
Leggett, B. J. (2005). Convergence and divergence in the movie review: Bonnie and Clyde. Film Criticism, 30(2). 1–23.
Litman, B. R. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. Journal of popular culture, 16(4), 159.
Macdonald, M. (2006). Muslim women and the veil: Problems of image and voice in media representations. Feminist Media Studies, 6(1), 7-23.
Martin J. R., & White P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave, London. Retrieved from (http://grammatics.com/appraisal/)
Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2011). Critical discourse analysis: Scrutinizing ideologically-driven discourses. International journal of humanities and social science, 1, 16.
Ridouani, D. (2011). The representation of Arabs and Muslims in western media. Ruta: revista universitària de treballs acadèmics, 2(3), 45-57.
Shaheen, J. G. (2003). Reel bad Arabs: How Hollywood vilifies a people. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 588(1), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203588001011
Spivak, G. (1993). Can the subaltern speak? In Williams, P., & Chrisman, L. (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66-111). Columbia University Press.
Taboada, M. (2011). Stages in an online review genre. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 31(2), 247-269.
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7-49.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & society, 6(2), 243-289.
Verschueren, J. (2015). Ideology in discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (2), 768–778. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Weimann, G. (1991). The influentials: back to the concept of opinion leaders?. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(2), 267-279.https://doi.org/10.1086/269257
Wu, H. B. (2013). Appraisal perspective on attitudinal analysis of public service advertising discourse. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 55.
Maram S. Almohaimeed is working at King Saud University (KSU). She holds M.A. degree in Applied Linguistics from the College of Languages and Translation at KSU. Her research interests revolve around discourse analysis and foreign language teaching and learning. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-3239