AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 5, Number 2. May   2021                                Pp. 18-38
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol5no2.2

Full Paper PDF 

Conceptual Metaphors in Milan Kundera’s Novel, Life Is Elsewhere 

Sara Mechraoui
Independent Researcher, Indianapolis
Indiana, USA
Email: saramechraoui@gmail.com

 

Received: 4/10/2021               Accepted:  5/16/2021              Published: 5/24/2021

 

Abstract:
This study’s primary purpose is to account for the unstated interpretation of Kundera’s novel Life Is Elsewhere (1973) from a cognitive stylistic perspective. His style seems at the first plain, but his philosophical and psychological treatment of subjects is significantly necessary than the narratological world he creates. The identification of the conceptual metaphors and both mega and micro-metaphors constitute the core elements of this paper. Following the title of life as elsewhere metaphor, the metaphors used in the novel are identified in the selected passages based on the metaphoricity they display. Thus, the procedure used is informed by the Metaphor Identification Procedure University Amsterdam since it is strategic and feasible. Excerpts from the novel are selected instead of the whole text for reasons of scope and space. The study’s findings are supposed to open up areas for research on the effects of metaphor-based analysis on working out the meaning of difficult contemporary items as far as literary dictum is concerned.
Keywords: Conceptual metaphors, cognitive linguistics, Milan Kundera, Metaphor Identification Procedure
VU University Amsterdam, Life Is Elsewhere.

Cite as: Mechraoui, S.  (2021). Conceptual Metaphors in Milan Kundera’s Novel, Life Is Elsewhere.
Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 5 (2) 18-38.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol5no2.2

References

Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca NY:

Cornell University Press.

Black, M. (1993). More about metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Eds.): Metaphor and thought.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan. In Sznajder, H.S & Deignan, A (Eds.), A corpus approach to metaphor description in scientific business discourse. (pp. 161-168) Valencia: Publicationes de la Universidad de Valencia.

Davidson, D. (1978). What Metaphors Mean. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 31-47. Retrieved February 14, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342976.

Grundmann.C.J. (2009). Dip into your savings! Applying cognitive metaphor theory in the business English classroom. An empirical study. (Doctoral dissertation, Koblenz-Landau University, 2009).

Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kundera, M. (1973). Life Is Elsewhere. New York : Alfred A..Knopf, Inc.

Kundera, M. (1974). Laughable Loves. USA : Alfred A.Knopf.

Kundera, M.  (1984). The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York: Harper & Row  Publishers Inc.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1992). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. (2006). The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (p. 17–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003

Lodge, D. (1966). Language of fiction: essays in criticism and verbal analysis of the English novel. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Muller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic view. USA: The University of Chicago Press.

Rakova, M. (2003). The extent of the literal. Metaphor, polysemy and theories of concept. Great Britain: Antony Row ltd, chippenham and Eastboom.

Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor:Multidisciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language (trans. R. Czerny), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.

Russo, J.P. (1989). I.A.Richards: his life and work. United States of America: British Library Cataloguing. Routledge.

Semino, E. (1997) Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.

Tolosa, R.B. (n.d). Cognitive Analysis applied to the literary Genre: the concepts of “body” and “nature” in the Shakespearean tragedy of King Lear. University of Valencia

Way, C.E. (1991). Knowledge representation and metaphor. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
Received: 4/10/2021   
Accepted: 5/16/2021
Published: 5/24/2021 
http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol5no2.2
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on tumblr
Share on reddit
Share on email

Dr. Sara Mechraoui is a recent Indiana University East Graduate (IUE); she earned the Graduate Certificate in Composition Studies in 2020. Sara got her Doctorate in English Literature in 2017 from Abou AlKacem SaadAllah University, Algiers, Algeria. Her Master’s concentration was English for Specific Purposes. She worked as an associate professor of English at the Teacher’s Training College (ENSL), Laghouat, Algeria, for three years and at Ammar Thelidji University for three years. She is currently working as a part-time online ESL instructor at the vRealm Inc.  ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-2155