AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 7, Number 2. May  2023                                Pp. 83-92
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no2.6 

Full paper PDF 

Colonial Discourse Studies: Uncovering the Unfair Otherness 

Abdelnaeim Ibrahim Awad Elaref
Department of English, College of Science and Humanities at Al-Ghat
Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia
Corresponding Author: abdelnaeimelaref@gmail.com

 

Received:02/19/2023             Accepted:04/18/2023             Published: 05/24/2023

 

Abstract:
This paper critically explores the role of colonial discourse studies in exploring cultural imperialism. It discusses the relevance of this academic field to our current understanding of the ideological dimensions of colonialism, imperialism, and globalization. Moreover, it outlines how related conceptualizations such as Orientalism, Said’s Orient and Occident, hegemony, and postcolonial theories are intrinsically linked to these studies. The significance of the study lies in illustrating, through reference to contemporary scholarship in this field, how the colonial discourse’s past, present, and future implications remain of enduring importance in contemporary social and political realities. Furthermore, it traces the writings of various third-world intellectuals that try to uncover the colonial discursive practices in the colonial context and shows how these practices are to create and sustain otherness. Finally, by examining how this field incorporates and synthesizes multiple disciplines, such as literature, history, linguistics, political science, anthropology, and sociology, this paper affirms the continued significance of this field in the contemporary world.
Keywords: Binary relationships, colonial discourse, cultural imperialism, dichotomy, Orientalism, otherness, unfair otherness

Cite as: Elaref, A.I.A. (2023). Colonial Discourse Studies: Uncovering the Unfair Otherness.  Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 7 (2): 83-92.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no2.6

References

Achebe, C. (2016). An image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Massachusetts Review (1), 14–27.  https://doi.org/10.1353/mar.2016.0003

Andrien, K. J., & Hulme, P. (1993). Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492-1787. Sixteenth Century Journal, 4,  329-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2541613

Ashcroft, B. (2014). The rhizome of post-colonial discourse. In R. Luckhurst, & P. Marks (Eds.), Literature and The Contemporary: Fictions and Theories of the Present, (pp. 111–126. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840680-10

Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating Diversity. Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London. Routledge

Brantlinger, P. (1985). Heart of Darkness”: “Anti-Imperialism, Racism, or Impressionism? Criticism, 4, 363–385.

Childs, P., & Williams, R. J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Post-Colonial Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315847481

Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth. Trans. Constance Farrington. New York: Grove Press.

Fox, R. E., Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1991). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. African Studies Review, 34(3),  204–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/524126

Frykenberg, R. E., & Viswanathan, G. (1992). Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. The American Historical Review, 97(1), 272-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2164697

Gilbert, H. (1996). Post-colonial drama: Theory, practice, politics. Theatre Research International, 22(03),  (p. 277)

Jan Mohamed, A. R. (1985). The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/448321

Johnson, D. (2011). Shakespeare and South Africa. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183150.001.0001

Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism/Postcolonialism. Routledge.

Lovell, T., & Miller, J. (1992). Seductions: Studies in Reading and Culture. Feminist Review, 40, 103–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395282

Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. Routledge.

Morrissey, L. (2005). Chinua Achebe (1930–) “Colonialist Criticism,” Hopes and Impediments (1974, 1988). In Lee Morrisey (Ed.)Debating the Canon: A Reader from Addison to Nafisi (pp. 73–85). Palgrave Macmillan New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04916-2_14

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Random House

Said, E. W. (1983). The World, the Text, and the Critic. Harvard University Press: Cambridge and Massachusetts

Said, E.W. (1997). Orientalism Reconsidered. In B. Moore-Gilbert, G. Stanton, & W. Maley (Eds.), Postcolonial Criticism (pp. 21-27). Longman.

Said, E. (2008). Culture & Imperialism. In Hongwai Yu Haomibo Xuebao/Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves (2), 750-772

Spivak, G. C. (1985). Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperialism. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 243-261

Spivak, G. (1985). The Rani of Simur. In F. Barker et al (Eds.), Europe and its Others. (pp. 247-272). University of Essex.

Spivak, G. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and Interpretation of Culture  (pp. 267–311) Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.

Tiffin, C., & Lawson, A.(eds.). (1994). De-Scribing Empire, Post-colonialism and Textuality. London and New York: Routledge.

Young, R. J. C. (1995). Colonial Desire. London and New York: Routledge.

Young, R. J. C. (2016). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119316817

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 02/19/2023  
Accepted: 04/18/2023
Published: 05/24/2023  
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-2534
http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no2.6 

Abdelnaeim Ibrahim Awad Elaref is an assistant professor of English literature at Majmaah University in Saudi Arabia. He is mainly interested in literary theory and applied criticism. He is the author of varied academic papers in literary studies. He has dedicated his career to studying and teaching literature, and his expertise in the field is highly regarded.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-2534