Social Darwinism in O’Neill’s The Hairy Ape: Studies of the Modern Issues and Their Influences on American Society in the 1920s

AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 4, Number4. October   2020                                Pp.177- 186
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no4.12

Full Paper PDF

                                        

Social Darwinism in O’Neill’s The Hairy Ape: Studies of the Modern Issues and Their
Influences on American Society in the 1920s

Fatimah Saleh A Alhumoud
Independent Researcher
Hotat Bani Tamim; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

 

Abstract:
In the early 20s, O’Neill produced The Hairy Ape and introduced an account of the misrepresentation of proletariat states in American society. The article aims to demonstrate that The Hairy Ape is not only a play concerning the subject of social classes but also an application of Social Darwinism. It opens up new significant issue to highlight the exploitation, isolation, and alcohol prohibition and women’s role in the society that affected all classes of society in the US. However, a social study proposed that Social Darwinism is the essence for illustrating social classes, the cause of class struggles, and changes to the status of women in America in the 1920s. This paper presents a novel finding that men, as workers, were adversely persecuted, growing numb to their human responses and emotions; they were personified as animals, devoid of intellectual thinking and acting on a level of basic instinct and pack mentality. Concurrent with the demise of male intellectualism and emotional awareness, there was an advance in the status of women; women flourished and experienced a growing sense of freedom in terms of fashion and voting.
Keywords:  American society, proletariat, social classes, Social Darwinism, status, The Hairy Ape, women

Cite as:  Alhumoud, F. S. A. (2020). Social Darwinism in O’Neill’s The Hairy Ape: Studies of the Modern Issues and Their Influences on American Society in the 1920s. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 4 (4).177- 186.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no4.12

References

Aaron, Paul, and Musto, David. (1918) Temperance and Prohibition in America: An Historical Overview. In: Moore, Mark H., and Gerstein, Dean R., (eds.) Alcohol and Public Policy: Beyond the Shadow of Prohibition. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, Pp. 127-180

Alexander, D. (1954). Eugene O’Neill as Social Critic. American Quarterly, 6(4), 349-363. doi:10.2307/3031370

Bab, J. (1931). As Europe Sees America’s Foremost Playwright. The Theatre Guild Magazine, Nov.1931 350–352.

Bannister, R. (2007). Social Darwinism. Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia. Available at https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/408

Bogard, (1972.) Contour in Times: The Plays of Eugene O’Neill. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bowler, (2016). Social Darwinism. obo in Sociology. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0166

Brody, J. E. (1996). Sex and the Survival of the Fittest: Calamities Are a Disaster for Men. New York Times.Par.1

Carthy, D, M., (1968). Hairy Ape or Bronge Ajax in Chester Clayton Long. The Role of Nemises in the structure of Selected Plays of Eugene O’Neill. The Hague: Monton & Co, Publishers.

Clark, (1947). Eugene O;Neill: The Man and His Plays. New York: Dover.

Darwin, Charles, (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray,

Dawkins, Richard (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.

Dawkins, Richard.(2016)  “Gaps in the Mind” , at Paola Cavalieri & Peter Singer (eds.) The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. St Martin’s Griffin, 199

Day, P. J. (1989). The New Poor in America: Isolationism in an International Political Economy. Social Work, 34(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/34.3.227

Dixon, T. (2009). America’s Difficulty with Darwin. History Today, 59(2), 22–28.

Dowling, R. M. (2009). Critical Companion to Eugene O’Neill: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. New York: Infobase Publishing.

Freedman, E. B. (1974). The New Woman: Changing Views of Women in the 1920s. The Journal of American History, 61(2), 372–393.

Halliday, R. J. (1971). Social Darwinism: A Definition. Victorian Studies, 14(4), 389– 405.

History.com. (2009). Women’s Suffrage. Available at www.history.com/topics/womens-history/the-fight-for-womens-suffrage

How Darwin Helped Shape Irish Writing. (2009). The Irish Times. Available at https://www.irishtimes.com/news/how-darwin-helped-shape-irish-writing-1.705483

History.com. (2009). Women’s Suffrage. Available at www.history.com/topics/womens-history/the-fight-for-womens-suffrage

Leech, Clifford (1963).  O’Neill. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.

Mackrell, J. (2018). The 1920s: Young women took the struggle for freedom into their personal lives. The Guardian. Available at www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/feb/05/the-1920s-young-women-took-the-struggle-for-freedom-into-their-personal-lives

O’Neill, E. (1922). The Hairy Ape. The Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 2020, from https://fb2bookfree.com/uploads/files/2020-03/1585323438_the-hairy-ape-by-eugene-oneill.pdf

Rosenberg E, (2005): The evolution of animals and plants via symbiosis with               microorganisms. EnvironMicrobiolRep. 2010;2(4):500–6. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00177.x

Singer, P., & Cavalieri, P. (Eds.). (1993). The Great Ape Project. St. Martin’s Griffin.

The Development of Foreign Policy. (2015). Office of the Historian. US Department of State.

The Guardian (2015) Review of The Hairy Ape review—Carvel is a man of steel. Available at www.theguardian.com/stage/2015/nov/01/hairy-ape-eugene-oneill-bertie-carvel-observer-review

The Second Industrial Revolution and International Relations. (2010). 123 Help Me.

Herbert Spencer, (The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/spencer/>