The Mediterranean World and the ‘Turk’ in Shakespeare’s Representation of the British Empire

AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 4, Number4. October   2020                                Pp.72 -83
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no4.6

 Full Paper PDF

 

The Mediterranean World and the ‘Turk’ in Shakespeare’s Representation of the British
Empire
 

Houria HALIL
Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Languages
University Abderahmane Mira
Bejaia, Algeria 

 Bouteldja RICHE
Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Languages
University Mouloud Mammeri
Tizi Ouzou, Algeria

 

 

Abstract :
This research explores Shakespeare’s representation of the so-called British Empire in its contact with other jostling empires, most notably the Ottoman Empire in the Mediterranean. To this end, four of Shakespeare’s Mediterranean plays Othello, the Moor of Venice (1603), The Merchant of Venice (1596), The Tempest (1611), and Cymbeline (1611) are taken understudy. By considering the Postcolonial historicist approach developed by literary scholars such as Stephen Greenblatt and Edward Said, the research argues that the issues of imperial relationships in Shakespeare are not solely centered on the transatlantic colony of Virginia, but it was also extended to the Mediterranean basin. The latter, during Tudor England and, later, Stuart Britain had much more trade and diplomatic activity than on the Atlantic seaboard. This economic activity created a cosmopolitan zone of contact wherein people of the Orient elbowed people from the West. This encounter gave rise to a pre-modern form of Orientalism, which is reflected in Shakespeare’s celebration of marital-cum-political endogamous relationships in his four plays mentioned earlier.
Keywords: British Empire, endogamy, exogamy, Mediterranean world, political alliances, representation, Shakespeare’s plays, ‘Turk’  

Cite as:  Houria HALIL, H.,&  RICHE, B. (2020). The Mediterranean World and the “Turk” in Shakespeare’s Representation of the British Empire. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 4 (4) 72 -83.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no4.6

References

Ashcroft, B et al. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Postcolonial Literatures. Ed 2nd, London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1989.

Braudel, F. (1972). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. (S. Reynolds, Trans.). London: Harper and Row.

Brotton, J. (2016). Why we must Thank the Turks, not Drake, for Defeating the Armada. The Guardian, p.1.

Brown, P. (1985). This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine: The Tempest and the discourse of colonialism. In J. Dollimore & A. Sinfield, (Eds.), (pp.48-71). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Gillies, J. (1994). Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean  Negotiations: The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Greenblatt, S. (1991). Marvelous possessions: The wonder of the New World. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Hulme, P. (1986). Colonial encounters: Europe and the native Caribbean 1492 – 1797. New York, NY: Methuen.

Jablonski, R.S & Oliver, S. (2013). The Political Economy of Plunder: Economic Opportunity and Modern Piracy. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 57, No. 4, (pp. 682-708). California: Sage Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24545613. Accessed on 22/03/2020.

Knapp, J. (1992). An Empire Nowhere: England, America, and Literature from Utopia to The Tempest. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Maclean, G. & Matar, N. (2011). Britain and the Islamic World, 1558–1713. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Marshall, T.  (2000). Theatre and Empire: Great Britain on the London stage under James VI and I. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Matar, N. (2005). Britain and Barbary, 1589-1689. Gainesville: Florida University Press.

Matar, N. (2009). Britons and Muslims in the early modern period: From prejudice to (a theory of) toleration. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3/4), 213-231. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group, 213-231.

Matar, N. (2000). Turks, Moors, and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Patterson, W. B. (1998). King James VI and the reunion of Christendom. London: Cambridge University Press.

Riche, B. (2012). William Shakespeare’s Cross-Generic Representation of Empires: A Reconsideration of Some Classic Postcolonial Readings of his Drama. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 5(3), 253-267.

Said, E. W. (1991). Orientalism, London: Penguin Books.

Shakespeare, W., & Alexander, P. (1997). The complete works of       Shakespeare. (Ed.). Peter Alexander. London: Harpercollins Pub Ltd.

Vitkus, D. J. (1997). Turning Turk in Othello: The conversion and damnation of the Moor. Shakespeare Quarterly.  48 (2), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2871278.

Waite, G. K. (2013). Reimagining Religious Identity: The Moor in Dutch and English Pamphlets, 1550-1620. In Renaissance Quarterly. Vol. 66. No. 4.The University of Chicago Press and Renaissance Society of America.

Wood, A. C. A. (1964). History of the Levant Company. London: Frank Cass and Co.

117total visits,3visits today