On Différance between Shakespeare’s Shylock and Bakathir’s Shylock 

AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Volume 4, Number3. August  2020                                   Pp.97-119
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no3.8

Full Paper PDF

 

On Différance between Shakespeare’s Shylock and Bakathir’s Shylock  

Rasha Saeed Badurais
English Language  Studies Section, School of Humanities
Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM),  Penang, Malaysia 

Nurul Farhana Low Binti Abdullah
English Language  Studies Section, School of Humanities
Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM),  Penang, Malaysia

 

 

Abstract:
Enigmatic Shylock, the central figure of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice (1596), and its varied interpretations continue to intrigue critics since the play’s publication. One of the most faithful yet different of its adaptations is Bakathir’s The New Shylock (1945). The present paper aims at deconstructing Shakespeare’s Shylock and Bakathir’s Shylock in the light of Derrida’s concept “différance” to compare the two versions of the Jew and possibly capture the  extremes of Jewish identity through several stages of their history. The significance of comparing Bakathir’s version of the Jew, which exemplifies the opposite Eastern pole, to the Shakespearean Western is supposed to portray two crucial stages in the process of Jewish identity construction. Tackling the two Shylocks from the deconstructive perspective provides a text-oriented analysis focusing primarily on the binaries and the semantic and etymological meanings of words that reflect the tell-tale moments in both texts. The study finds out that whereas Shakespeare’s Shylock is defeated because of his inability to control events, Bakathir’s Shylock succeeds in mastering the play of circumstances, but temporarily. His suicide, at the end, enhances possibilities to answer the main inquiry: Who is “Shylock”? Therefore, further studies are recommended to compare and contrast Shakespeare’s Shylock with the most recent adaptations, in the East or the West, using the same theoretical framework to provide an image of the Jew/ Zionist in the spatial and temporal processes of the Jewish enigmatic identity development.
Keywords: Bakathir, Derrida, différance, Jewish identity, Shakespeare,  Shylock, The Merchant of Venice, The New Shylock

Cite as:  Badurais, R, S., & Abdullah, N. F.L. (2020). On Différance between Shakespeare’s Shylock and Bakathir’s Shylock. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies 4 (3) .97-119.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no3.8

References

Abou Salem, H. (2019). “Al Nakbah and the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians.” Blogs: Palestinian Refugees: A Crisis of Recognition. Retrieved 15 December 2019 from https://blogs.cardiff.ac.uk/palestinian-refugees/al-nakbah-and-the-ethnic-cleansing-of-palestinians/

Almasiri, A. (2002). Man Hoa Al-Yahodi?[Who is a Jew?]. (3rd ed.). Cairo: Dar Al-Shorooq. Retrieved from https://foulabook.com/ar/book/%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%87%D9%88-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%9F-pdf

Awwad, M. (1980). “Masrah Ali Ahmed Bakathir” [Ali Ahmed Bakathir’s Drama]. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Egypt: Cairo University.

Bakathir, A. A. (1945). Shylock Al-Jadeed [The New Shylock].  Egypt: Maktabat Masr.

Bakathir, A. A. (1958).  Fann Almasrahyyah min Khilal Tajareby Alshakhsiah [The Art of Drama through my Personal Experience]. Egypt: Maktabat Masr.

Baker, W. & Vickers. B. (eds.) (2005). The Merchant of Venice.  London: Thoemmes Continuum. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/The%20Merchant%20of%20Venice%20(Shakespeare_%20the%20Critical%20Tradition)%20(%20PDFDrive.com%20).pdf

Bayer, M. (2007). “The Merchant of Venice, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the perils of Shakespearean appropriation.” Comparative Drama. 41(4), 465-492. Retrieved from   https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-192351853/the-merchant-of-venice-the-arab-israeli-conflict

Bloom, H. (1998). Shakespeare: The invention of the human.  New York: Riverhead Books. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/shakespeare-the-invention-of-the-human-e185263408.html

Bloom, H. & Heims, N. (eds). (2008). Bloom’s Shakespeare through the Ages: The Merchant of Venice.  New York: Infobase Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-merchant-of-venice-blooms-shakespeare-through-the-ages-e162447818.html

Budick, E. (ed.). (2001). Ideology and Jewish Identity in Israeli and American Literature. New York: State University of New York Press. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/ideology-and-jewish-identity-in-israeli-and-american-literature-e158052868.html

Colebrook, C. (2014). “Difference.” In Z. Derek & L. Lawlor (eds.). (2014). Blackwell Companion to Derrida. (pp. 99-115). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/a-companion-to-derrida-e196416445.html

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. (A. Bass Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1967). Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/jacques-derrida-writing-and-difference-web-del- profesor-e7397499.html

Derrida, J. (1982). “Signature, Event, Context.” In J. Derrida, Margins of Philosophy (A. Bass  Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1971). Retrieved from  https://www.pdfdrive.com/margins-of-philosophy-d185663458.html

Freund, E. (1985). “Ariachne’s Broken Woof”: the Rhetoric of Citation in Troilus and Cressida.” In P. Parker & G. Hartman (eds.) (1985). Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. (pp.19-35). New York: Metheun.  Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Shakespeare%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20Theory%20(%20PDFDrive.com%20).pdf

Gerson, J. M. “Gender Theory, Intersectionality, and New Understanding of Jewish Identity.” Journal of Jewish Identities, 11(1), 5-16. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1353/jji.2018.0002

Gross, J. (1994). Shylock: Four hundred years in the life of a legend. London: Vintage.

Hennessey, K. (2018). Shakespeare on the Arabian Peninsula.  London: Palgrave MacMillan. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/shakespeare-on-the-arabian-peninsula-e188532898.html

Jamal, A. (2015). “Almukhtalif wa Almu’talif bain Masrahyyati Tajer AlBundugyyah li Shakespeare wa Shylock Aljadeed li Ali Ahmed Bakathir: Derasah Tannasyyah Mugarenah.” [The Similarities and Differences between Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Ali Ahmed Bakathir’s The New Shylock: A Comparative Intertextual Study]. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Qatar: Qatar University). Retrieved from https://qspace.qu.edu.qa/bitstream/handle/10576/3904/Asmaa%20al%20JamalThesis%20Final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Jum’a, M. N. (2003). “Surat Alshakhsyyah Alyahudiah fi Masrahyyat Ali Ahmed Bakathir.” [The image of the Jewish character in Ali Ahmed Bakathir’s plays]. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Islam Abad:  World Islamic University. Retrieved from http://www.bakatheer.com/upload/noor_mohamed_juma_2.pdf

Lachman, F. (2020).  “Modern Jewish History: A History of Jews in European Theater from 1600 to the 20th century.” Retrieved from myjewishlearning.com/article/European-jewish-theatre/

Moore, D. (ed.) (2008).  American Jewish identity politics.  Ann Arbor: The University of  Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/american-jewish-identity-politics-e156650292.html

Muhi, M., Saleh, M. & Hasson, S. (2019). “The Character of Shylock as a Cultural Mark: Shakespeare’s The merchant of Venice and Bakathir’s The new Shylock.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334173858_The_character_of_shylock_as_a_cultural_mark

Oxford University Press (2010, 2017, 2019). Oxford Dictionary of English.  Version 11.0.495. www.mobisystems.com

Parker, P. & Hartman, G. (eds). (1985). Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. London: Metheun. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/shakespeare-and-the-question-of-theory-e191702757.html

Royle, N. (2003). Jacques Derrida.  London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/jacques-derrida-e158559997.html

Saleh, M. M. (2005).  History of Palestine: A Methodological Study of a Critical Issue. (3rd ed.).  Cairo: Al-Falah Foundation.

Schwartz, D. (2016). “The Social Doctrine of Zeev Jabotinsky, from the Fathers of Zionism.” Open Journal of Political Science. 6, 387-392. Retrieved 20 December 2019 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2016.64034.

Shakespeare, W. (1596).  The Merchant of Venice. Feedbooks.  http://shakespeare.mit.edu/

Shetywi, M. (1995). “The Merchant of Venice in Arabic.”  https://www.bing.com/search?q=Shetywi+The+&form=EDNTHT&mkt=en-my&httpsmsn=1&msnews=1&plvar=0&refig=cae5ee64b335431d90350a3942327169&PC=HCTS&sp=-1&pq=shetywi+the+&sc=8-12&qs=n&sk=&cvid=cae5ee64b335431d90350a3942327169

Spivak, G. C. (1997).  Preface. In J. Derrida (1997). Of Grammatology. (G.C. Spivak, Trans.). USA: John Hopkins University Press. (Originally published 1967).

Sufiani , N. (1994). “Al Ta’theer AlShakespeary fi Masrah Bakatheer: Derasah Mugarenah” [Shakespearean Influence on Bakathir’s Drama: A Comparative Study]. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Saudi Arabia: Um Alqura University. Retrieved from http://www.bakatheer.com/upload/al-tathtir_al-shiksberi-2.pdf

Tapper, A. J. H. (2016). Judaisms.  California: University of California Press. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/judaisms-a-twenty-first-century-introduction-to-jews-and-jewish-identities-e188054602.htm l

Wirth-Nesher, H. (ed.) (2002). What is Jewish Literature?  USA: Varda Books. Retrieved from https://www.pdfdrive.com/what-is-jewish-literature-e184985291.html

70total visits,1visits today